Here is the information as advised by the ICO:
Section 8 FOIA requires people make requests in writing (including by electronic means) and include their name and address for correspondence. A request isn't invalid just because someone's used technology to send multiple requests at the same time. But these issues may be relevant:
- if you're concerned that the requesters haven't provided their real names. A request made in a false name is not valid. You can choose to question the requester's identity if you believe they've used a false name. Have a look at our guidance on pseudonyms: Recognising a request under the FOI Act
- if you think that one group has used AI to send multiple requests. Requests sent by people who appear to be acting together can potentially be aggregated for cost purposes if the requests are for the same or similar information: Can we aggregate the cost of a number of requests?
- if you suspect the requests were sent out by different people acting together as part of a campaign. Requests sent as part of campaigns are not necessarily vexatious: requesters may be acting together simply to gain information that will assist their case. Our guidance on vexatious requests (section 14(1)) will help: Dealing with vexatious requests
Knowledge Bank
FOI Best Practice
Log the FOI request in the FOI Log.Check whether you have the information in a recorded format.
Review our template response.
Be careful not to disclose any personal data.
Check in the FOI Examples & Advice for specific guidance about popular FOI requests to help with your response.
If you are still unsure or have any specific questions, email us:
Test your FOI Knowledge: